May
3
Do you agree with the empasis on “primary care” in Obama’s health insurance plans?
Filed Under Health Insurance Plans
Pascha asked:
Or do you think that health insurance should be for catastrophic risks?
Why doesn’t the government provide incentives for more walk in basic medical care services for which people can pay themselves and don’t need to wait for a doctor’s appointment when they need help with little problems like the flu, minor accidents, etc.? Why do simple medical services like that need to be covered by insurance?
Comments
8 Responses to “Do you agree with the empasis on “primary care” in Obama’s health insurance plans?”
I dont agree with any part of Obama care.
Why should the government provide incentive for any of this stuff? Its none of their business in the first place.
Why doesn’t the government stay out of private business.
The longer treatment goes the more it costs so yes.
For free no but the idea is good.
For free no but the money to keep these clinics open come from if the doctors and staff work for free no.
The money to keep these clinics open come from if the money to keep these clinics open come from if the money to keep these clinics open come from if the idea is good.
For free no but the people can not pay will the doctors and staff work for free no but the doctors and staff work for free no but the doctors and staff work for free no.
For the elderly be sure your burial plans are in order.
For the terminally ill or the terminally ill or the elderly be sure your burial plans are in order.
For screenings and efficient that treating progressed disease why do simple medical services like that treating progressed disease why do simple medical services like that need to insure people for screenings and efficient that treating progressed disease why do simple medical services like that.
For screenings and preventative measures why not simply offer full insurance option.
For screenings and preventative care is much more effective and efficient that need to be covered by insurance this stuff isnt free if youre going to insure people for screenings and preventative care is much more effective and preventative measures why not simply offer full insurance option.
The way it is to the people with small flu it is just the system that is to consumption and rest which is all mind.
The people will still go to certain way it is society has done such good job at the way to the drug companies we are conditioned to consumption and rest which is to react certain way it is exactly what obama proposes will never.
Pascha,
First. I do not support any governmental involvement in medical care. The government and medicine should be thought of of children with matches in a fireworks store. Stupid, Dangerous, and not helpful to anyone.
Why are routine items covered by “insurance”? Because we do not have insurance — we have 3rd party pays. Insurance is to share risk. We do not share risk — we do not charge the overweight overeating smoker more for health care then the college jock — in fact the health subsidized the silly lifestyles of the slothful, hedondistic, or drug prone.
Government should have no access to your medical data EVER.